Defining our parameters
Before we continue though, I had better clear up exactly what I’m talking about when it comes to diversification. It may seem deceptively simple.
What can happen is that people conflate diversification with asset allocation[5]. The two can intermix[6], but close attention needs to be given to both. Without getting too bogged down in technicalities, asset allocation is broadly how we decide how many of our “eggs” are going to be put into how many different “baskets”, or asset classes.
Whereas diversification is how we spread out investments within those asset classes. Equities are an asset class. The shares of Apple, GSK, or McDonalds are examples of holdings within that asset class.
This is where things can get tricky though. Say, for example, an investor holds investments in each of the main asset classes. Seems diverse enough. But, if they only hold a single investment in each, are they truly getting the benefit of diversification?
On the flip side, another investor may hold 100s of shares spread across numerous sectors, but no other assets. They may be effectively diversified within the equity market, but if an economic problem sends all (or most) equities plummeting (a la 2008), not holding any other asset class to cushion the fall may prove problematic.
Also, there are several circumstantial factors that can affect how we think about diversification and/or asset allocation. A 25-year-old’s portfolio will likely look very different to that of a retiree.
In a very basic and simple example, a financial advisor may guide a young person to put most of their spare wealth into shares. Whereas someone approaching retirement will likely be advised to move some of their money into bonds.
The priorities of the underlying investor also need to be considered. Are they after capital gains, income, or a combination of both? The answers will sway their holdings. There are strategies and longstanding precedents behind this too. There are “60:40[7]” portfolios, “long-short strategies[8]”, and even “hodling[9]”.
Evidently, this is such a broad area that it would be near-impossible to cover everything in a single report. For those looking for specifics, there are countless resources online that go in-depth on investment strategies and the like.
In this whitepaper, what we’ll do instead is explore the idea of diversity from an asset allocation perspective. We will take our results, look at how investors are allocated, and explore what’s going on within those asset classes. What we will not do is go into detail on specific holdings within those classes.
Again, to reiterate, this isn’t to be used as a bible on all things investing. In reality, there is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all strategy. What’s best for any investor will depend on their circumstances, which will need to be discussed with a qualified advisor.
With that said, let’s explore what our survey revealed.